You are not connected to the Beloit College network. Access to online content and services may require you to authenticate with your library.
Remote Access
Getting this item's online copy...Find a copy in the library
Getting this item's location and availability...WorldCat
Find it in libraries globally
Worldwide libraries own this item
Details
| Document Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| All Authors / Contributors: | Sharon E Parkes; A Ross Thomas |
| ISSN: | 0957-8234 |
| Language Note: | English |
| Unique Identifier: | 424934110 |
| Notes: | Adult Education |
| Awards: |
Abstract:
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to report on the values practised by five effective secondary principals and to seek to identify common values that underpin their work practices. Design/methodology/approach: Principals were observed, each for two days, at work in their schools. From the observations of each principal activities were recorded and the principals' behaviours therein were subjected to analysis. Values manifest in the principals' behaviours were confirmed through an exhaustive process of triangulation--comparison with the espoused values that emerged through completion of both the Senge and Rokeach Scales and through private interviews. Findings: The values identified have been placed in three categories--those relating to Interpersonal Relationships, Operational Style, and Personal Qualities/Attributes. An unexpected outcome was the identification of principals "interruptibility"--the willingness to be interrupted because of the value placed on quality interpersonal relationships, to enable principals to attend to others' concerns, and to allow the person interrupting to feel valued in terms of his/her concern taking priority over whatever else the principal was doing. Practical implications: That element of "efficiency" advocated in much of the time management literature--"Thou shalt not be interrupted"--is apparently ignored by effective principals. Principals apparently accept this as part and parcel of their work in schools. Originality/value: The study reflects some of the limitations of qualitative investigations--"sample short but data heavy". Generalisations may be difficult to extract. Because of the severe triangulation process much data were discarded and thus other findings may have been masked. (Contains 5 figures and 6 tables.)
Retrieving notes about this item